Immigrants from Denmark vs Immigrants from Israel Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 98,165,053 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel within Immigrant from Denmark communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.320. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Denmark within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.139% in Immigrants from Israel. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Denmark corresponds to an increase of 138.6 Immigrants from Israel.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in median female earnings ($43,646 compared to $46,902, a difference of 7.5%), median earnings ($53,186 compared to $57,034, a difference of 7.2%), and per capita income ($53,799 compared to $57,384, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.99%), householder income over 65 years ($68,801 compared to $69,857, a difference of 1.5%), and median household income ($98,510 compared to $104,090, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 17.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 12.7%), and single female poverty (20.5% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and poverty (11.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 9.0%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.66%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.1% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 18.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.71%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 17.0%), single father households (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 14.9%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.9% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 0.90%), currently married (47.6% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and married-couple households (47.3% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 40.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 33.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 5.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 12.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 25.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 22.3%), master's degree (19.5% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 15.9%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.5% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 0.010%), 11th grade (93.7% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.23%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Israel communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 20.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 20.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.4% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 1.0%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 2.9%).