Austrian vs Costa Rican Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 231,568,132 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans within Austrian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.954. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Austrians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.174% in Costa Ricans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Austrians corresponds to an increase of 174.3 Costa Ricans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Austrian and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.4% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 12.3%), median male earnings ($59,359 compared to $54,279, a difference of 9.4%), and per capita income ($48,116 compared to $44,090, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,898 compared to $53,106, a difference of 2.3%), median female earnings ($40,923 compared to $39,622, a difference of 3.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,470 compared to $61,638, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Austrian and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 18.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 17.6%), and receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 1.1%), single mother poverty (28.7% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and single female poverty (20.4% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Austrian and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.6%), female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.2%), and male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.86%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Austrian and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.5% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 8.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.11%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Austrian and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 13.2%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 5.9%), and births to unmarried women (31.0% compared to 32.7%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.71%), family households (64.5% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and married-couple households (48.6% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Austrian and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 7.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 56.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.69%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.84%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Austrian and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 33.7%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 15.4%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.61%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.62%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Austrian and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 14.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 12.5%), and male disability (11.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.57%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.9%).