Immigrants from Malaysia vs Bhutanese Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Malaysia
Bhutanese
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Malaysia
Bhutanese
11.0%
MALE POVERTY
64.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
155th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.5%
MALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
15th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Bhutanese Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 197,921,131 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.136 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,976,396 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.078 and weighted average of 9.5%, a difference of 16.4%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Malaysia | Bhutanese |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 2.8% |
| Maximum | 37.1% | 31.2% |
| Range | 35.8% | 28.3% |
| Mean | 11.2% | 8.9% |
| Median | 9.9% | 8.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.8% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.2% | 11.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.7% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.6% | 4.8% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Malaysia by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Malaysia are Immigrants from Kazakhstan (11.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Costa Rican (11.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Scotch-Irish (11.0%, a difference of 0.11%), and Colombian (11.0%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Armenians | 68.0 /100 | #148 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 67.9 /100 | #149 | Good 11.0% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 67.6 /100 | #150 | Good 11.0% |
| Venezuelans | 67.4 /100 | #151 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 67.3 /100 | #152 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 65.2 /100 | #153 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 64.8 /100 | #154 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 64.7 /100 | #155 | Good 11.0% |
| Costa Ricans | 63.9 /100 | #156 | Good 11.0% |
| Scotch-Irish | 63.7 /100 | #157 | Good 11.0% |
| Colombians | 63.0 /100 | #158 | Good 11.0% |
| Taiwanese | 62.7 /100 | #159 | Good 11.0% |
| Soviet Union | 60.3 /100 | #160 | Good 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 59.7 /100 | #161 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #162 | Average 11.1% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from North Macedonia (9.4%, a difference of 0.29%), Luxembourger (9.5%, a difference of 0.52%), Norwegian (9.5%, a difference of 0.65%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.4%, a difference of 0.67%), and Immigrants from Bolivia (9.4%, a difference of 0.79%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.6% |