Czech vs Latvian Poverty
COMPARE
Czech
Latvian
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Czechs
Latvians
10.8%
POVERTY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
38th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.5%
POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
18th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czech vs Latvian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 484,408,527 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Czechs and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.223 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,650,145 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.396 and weighted average of 10.5%, a difference of 3.0%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czech | Latvian |
| Minimum | 0.93% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 34.6% | 52.6% |
| Range | 33.7% | 50.7% |
| Mean | 9.5% | 9.9% |
| Median | 9.5% | 8.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.6% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.9% | 12.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.3% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 7.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 7.3% |
Demographics Similar to Czechs and Latvians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Immigrants from Greece (10.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Cypriot (10.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Tongan (10.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Poland (10.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Macedonian (10.8%, a difference of 0.36%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Immigrants from Scotland (10.6%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (10.6%, a difference of 0.51%), Luxembourger (10.6%, a difference of 0.58%), Eastern European (10.6%, a difference of 0.74%), and Swedish (10.6%, a difference of 0.85%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Burmese | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.5 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Greeks | 99.5 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Danes | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Iranians | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Macedonians | 99.4 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.4 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Tongans | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Cypriots | 99.3 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 10.8% |