Immigrants from Jordan vs Immigrants from Sri Lanka Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 100,353,250 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sri Lanka within Immigrant from Jordan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.490. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jordan within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.038% in Immigrants from Sri Lanka. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Jordan corresponds to a decrease of 38.1 Immigrants from Sri Lanka.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,185 compared to $109,741, a difference of 12.9%), per capita income ($45,066 compared to $50,555, a difference of 12.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,164 compared to $119,094, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 3.2%), householder income under 25 years ($51,370 compared to $54,512, a difference of 6.1%), and median female earnings ($40,977 compared to $44,161, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 16.3%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.8% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 13.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.6% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 0.56%), single father poverty (16.2% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 10.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 8.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.060%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.060%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 0.41%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.44%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 10.2%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 7.5%), and single mother households (6.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.010%), family households (65.0% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.19%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 28.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 5.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 37.4%), professional degree (4.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 30.1%), and master's degree (16.1% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.010%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.010%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 9.8%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 7.9%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 0.27%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.80%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.80%).