Immigrants from Jordan vs Immigrants from Guyana Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 99,240,453 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guyana within Immigrant from Jordan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.564. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jordan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.337% in Immigrants from Guyana. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Jordan corresponds to an increase of 336.5 Immigrants from Guyana.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 43.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,164 compared to $90,186, a difference of 17.7%), and median family income ($107,715 compared to $92,513, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,977 compared to $40,773, a difference of 0.50%), median earnings ($48,673 compared to $45,204, a difference of 7.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,370 compared to $55,726, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 57.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.2% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 41.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 38.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 1.3%), single father poverty (16.2% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.5% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 54.4%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 41.1%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 39.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 0.97%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 35.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 9.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.90%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 25.1%), births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 20.7%), and married-couple households (47.7% compared to 41.6%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.080%), family households (65.0% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.78%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 240.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 91.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 77.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 29.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 63.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 77.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 53.9%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 52.5%), and professional degree (4.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 24.2%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 17.4%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.13%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 1.9%).