Ute vs U.S. Virgin Islander Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Ute
U.S. Virgin Islander
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Ute
U.S. Virgin Islanders
15.7%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
307th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.5%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
290th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs U.S. Virgin Islander Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,243,903 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.584 and weighted average of 15.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 85,320,269 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of U.S. Virgin Islanders and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.596 and weighted average of 14.5%, a difference of 7.9%.

Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ute | U.S. Virgin Islander |
Minimum | 11.8% | 0.45% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 88.2% | 99.5% |
Mean | 45.2% | 18.4% |
Median | 37.4% | 14.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.9% | 10.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 62.8% | 20.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 42.9% | 9.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 31.5% | 14.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 30.4% | 14.7% |
Demographics Similar to Ute and U.S. Virgin Islanders by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Potawatomi (15.8%, a difference of 0.57%), Pennsylvania German (15.6%, a difference of 0.75%), Blackfeet (15.5%, a difference of 1.2%), Alaska Native (15.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and Aleut (15.4%, a difference of 1.8%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to U.S. Virgin Islanders are Bahamian (14.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Dominica (14.5%, a difference of 0.23%), Nonimmigrants (14.6%, a difference of 0.28%), White/Caucasian (14.5%, a difference of 0.31%), and French Canadian (14.6%, a difference of 0.40%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Whites/Caucasians | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 14.5% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 14.5% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 14.6% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 14.6% |
French Canadians | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 14.6% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 14.6% |
Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 14.7% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 14.7% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 14.8% |
French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 15.0% |
Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 15.0% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 15.1% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 15.2% |
Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 15.2% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 15.4% |
Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 15.4% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 15.5% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 15.6% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 15.7% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 15.8% |