Ute vs Potawatomi Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Ute
Potawatomi
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Ute
Potawatomi
15.7%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
307th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.8%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
308th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Potawatomi Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,243,903 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.584 and weighted average of 15.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,014,628 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.453 and weighted average of 15.8%, a difference of 0.57%.

Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ute | Potawatomi |
Minimum | 11.8% | 3.4% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 88.2% | 96.6% |
Mean | 45.2% | 28.9% |
Median | 37.4% | 24.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.9% | 16.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 62.8% | 40.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 42.9% | 23.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 31.5% | 17.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 30.4% | 17.3% |
Demographics Similar to Ute and Potawatomi by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are American (15.8%, a difference of 0.73%), Pennsylvania German (15.6%, a difference of 0.75%), Blackfeet (15.5%, a difference of 1.2%), Yakama (15.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and Alaska Native (15.4%, a difference of 1.7%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Potawatomi are American (15.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Yakama (15.9%, a difference of 1.0%), Pennsylvania German (15.6%, a difference of 1.3%), Seminole (16.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and Comanche (16.0%, a difference of 1.6%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 14.8% |
French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 15.0% |
Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 15.0% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 15.1% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 15.2% |
Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 15.2% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 15.4% |
Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 15.4% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 15.5% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 15.6% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 15.7% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 15.8% |
Americans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 15.8% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 15.9% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 16.0% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 16.0% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |