Immigrants from Jordan vs Samoan Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Jordan
Samoan
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Jordan
Samoans
12.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
86.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
132nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
73.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
152nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Jordan vs Samoan Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,244,945 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.414 and weighted average of 12.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 225,052,897 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Samoans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.151 and weighted average of 13.1%, a difference of 2.2%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Jordan | Samoan |
Minimum | 1.8% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 64.9% | 38.0% |
Range | 63.1% | 35.7% |
Mean | 13.0% | 12.8% |
Median | 11.7% | 12.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.8% | 9.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.5% | 14.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.7% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.4% | 5.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.3% | 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Jordan and Samoans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are Immigrants from Western Europe (12.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Switzerland (12.9%, a difference of 0.22%), French (12.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Peruvian (12.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and Chilean (12.9%, a difference of 0.45%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Samoans are Immigrants from Germany (13.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Tsimshian (13.1%, a difference of 0.24%), Taiwanese (13.1%, a difference of 0.27%), Yugoslavian (13.1%, a difference of 0.43%), and Immigrants from Kazakhstan (13.0%, a difference of 0.68%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Jordan | 86.9 /100 | #132 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 85.8 /100 | #134 | Excellent 12.9% |
French | 85.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 12.9% |
Peruvians | 85.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 12.9% |
Chileans | 84.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.9% |
Immigrants | France | 83.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.9% |
Basques | 83.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 12.9% |
Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 12.9% |
Icelanders | 81.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 13.0% |
Brazilians | 80.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 13.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |
Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |
Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145 | Good 13.0% |
Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |