Immigrants from Jordan vs South African Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Jordan
South African
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Jordan
South Africans
12.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
86.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
132nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
88.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Jordan vs South African Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,244,945 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.414 and weighted average of 12.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,540,648 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.636 and weighted average of 12.8%, a difference of 0.35%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Jordan | South African |
| Minimum | 1.8% | 2.6% |
| Maximum | 64.9% | 44.9% |
| Range | 63.1% | 42.4% |
| Mean | 13.0% | 10.8% |
| Median | 11.7% | 9.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.8% | 5.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.5% | 13.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.7% | 8.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.4% | 8.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.3% | 8.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Jordan and South Africans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are Immigrants from Argentina (12.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Vietnam (12.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Western Europe (12.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Switzerland (12.9%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Brazil (12.8%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Immigrants from Belarus (12.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Ukraine (12.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Brazil (12.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Argentinean (12.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Norway (12.8%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Albanians | 90.8 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| New Zealanders | 90.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 90.3 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| French Canadians | 90.2 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.9 /100 | #123 | Excellent 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 89.3 /100 | #124 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 88.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 12.8% |
| South Africans | 88.4 /100 | #127 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 88.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 87.9 /100 | #129 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 87.1 /100 | #130 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 87.0 /100 | #131 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 86.9 /100 | #132 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 85.8 /100 | #134 | Excellent 12.9% |
| French | 85.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Peruvians | 85.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Chileans | 84.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 83.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Basques | 83.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 12.9% |