Immigrants from Jordan vs Chickasaw Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Jordan
Chickasaw
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Jordan
Chickasaw
12.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
86.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
132nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Jordan vs Chickasaw Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,244,945 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.414 and weighted average of 12.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,289 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 23.6%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Jordan | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 1.8% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 64.9% | 38.6% |
Range | 63.1% | 36.7% |
Mean | 13.0% | 18.1% |
Median | 11.7% | 17.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.8% | 14.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.5% | 20.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.7% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.4% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.3% | 5.9% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Jordan by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are Immigrants from Argentina (12.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Vietnam (12.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Western Europe (12.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Switzerland (12.9%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Brazil (12.8%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 88.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 12.8% |
South Africans | 88.4 /100 | #127 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 88.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 87.9 /100 | #129 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 87.1 /100 | #130 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 87.0 /100 | #131 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 86.9 /100 | #132 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 85.8 /100 | #134 | Excellent 12.9% |
French | 85.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 12.9% |
Peruvians | 85.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 12.9% |
Chileans | 84.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.9% |
Immigrants | France | 83.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.9% |
Basques | 83.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 12.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.50%), Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |