Immigrants from Oceania Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
Select to Compare
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Immigrants from Oceania Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
10.4%
POVERTY | SENIORS > 65
88.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
130th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Oceania Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,434,853 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.274 and weighted average of 10.4%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.52% in poverty level among seniors over the age of 65.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Oceania influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 within an area, or if Immigrants from Oceania simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Immigrants from Iran (10.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Ottawa (10.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Cambodian (10.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Egyptian (10.5%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Hungary (10.4%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
| Hmong | 90.0 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Asians | 89.9 /100 | #124 | Excellent 10.4% |
| Immigrants from Philippines | 89.4 /100 | #125 | Excellent 10.4% |
| Immigrants from Hungary | 89.1 /100 | #126 | Excellent 10.4% |
| Cambodians | 89.1 /100 | #127 | Excellent 10.4% |
| Ottawa | 88.5 /100 | #128 | Excellent 10.4% |
| Immigrants from Iran | 88.4 /100 | #129 | Excellent 10.4% |
| Immigrants from Oceania | 88.4 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.4% |
| Egyptians | 87.8 /100 | #131 | Excellent 10.5% |
| Immigrants from Turkey | 87.7 /100 | #132 | Excellent 10.5% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 87.5 /100 | #133 | Excellent 10.5% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 86.8 /100 | #134 | Excellent 10.5% |
| Immigrants from Norway | 86.5 /100 | #135 | Excellent 10.5% |
| Immigrants from Serbia | 86.4 /100 | #136 | Excellent 10.5% |
| Immigrants from Australia | 85.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 10.5% |
Immigrants from Oceania Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Oceania Data | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Data |
| Minimum | 0.10% | 2.5% |
| Maximum | 32.2% | 75.3% |
| Range | 32.1% | 72.8% |
| Mean | 7.9% | 13.3% |
| Median | 6.9% | 10.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.4% | 8.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.3% | 13.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.9% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.6% | 12.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.5% | 12.3% |
Correlation Details
| Immigrants from Oceania Percentile | Sample Size | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.10% | 280,566,674 | 10.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 14,034,565 | 9.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.06% | 4,711,147 | 9.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.49% | 2,209,104 | 9.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.96% | 803,519 | 7.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.42% | 504,671 | 9.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.84% | 624,301 | 10.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.36% | 181,485 | 10.6% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.65% | 261,250 | 13.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.16% | 82,529 | 11.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.49% | 79,231 | 10.2% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.17% | 208,666 | 10.1% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.43% | 41,982 | 11.8% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.88% | 4,131 | 7.4% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.35% | 3,293 | 19.9% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.93% | 5,177 | 10.9% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.12% | 63,291 | 12.4% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.82% | 15,342 | 19.7% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.06% | 6,299 | 19.8% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.45% | 5,221 | 10.7% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.97% | 624 | 6.3% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.31% | 290 | 3.8% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.89% | 2,174 | 8.3% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.25% | 4,185 | 17.3% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.17% | 1,674 | 13.5% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.94% | 7,236 | 5.0% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.36% | 5,411 | 2.5% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.73% | 102 | 23.7% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.09% | 188 | 75.3% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.76% | 693 | 7.8% |
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.16% | 398 | 11.5% |