Danish Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
COMPARE
Danish
Select to Compare
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Danish Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
8.8%
POVERTY | SENIORS > 65
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
6th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Danish Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 471,575,123 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Danes and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.494 and weighted average of 8.8%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Danes within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.26% in poverty level among seniors over the age of 65.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Danes and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Danes influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 within an area, or if Danes simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Danes by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Danes are Immigrants from India (8.8%, a difference of 0.45%), Swedish (8.7%, a difference of 0.81%), Norwegian (8.7%, a difference of 1.4%), German (9.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and Czech (9.0%, a difference of 2.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants from India | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 8.8% |
| Danes | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 8.8% |
| Germans | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| English | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Scandinavians | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Croatians | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Poles | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Dutch | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Danish Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Danish Data | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Data |
| Minimum | 0.19% | 1.6% |
| Maximum | 62.8% | 36.1% |
| Range | 62.6% | 34.5% |
| Mean | 17.9% | 10.4% |
| Median | 15.3% | 8.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.5% | 7.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.7% | 12.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.2% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.8% | 7.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.7% | 7.2% |
Correlation Details
| Danish Percentile | Sample Size | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.19% | 356,016,565 | 11.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.71% | 69,659,570 | 8.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.20% | 24,394,967 | 7.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.70% | 8,873,158 | 7.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.25% | 3,142,981 | 8.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.73% | 1,944,843 | 7.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.22% | 1,447,681 | 8.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.75% | 1,634,779 | 6.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.21% | 1,147,962 | 7.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.73% | 942,346 | 6.1% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.27% | 772,078 | 7.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.77% | 461,006 | 7.2% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.18% | 251,179 | 8.1% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.81% | 180,959 | 7.4% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.21% | 125,745 | 7.6% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.74% | 196,584 | 4.5% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.28% | 102,480 | 7.0% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.77% | 53,263 | 8.8% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.26% | 20,986 | 13.7% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.77% | 33,819 | 7.3% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.41% | 14,134 | 7.5% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.78% | 22,041 | 10.3% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.22% | 22,540 | 11.5% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.73% | 6,505 | 13.0% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.29% | 2,920 | 8.5% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.71% | 16,186 | 9.3% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.37% | 15,186 | 10.9% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.80% | 7,418 | 8.2% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.37% | 11,546 | 11.1% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.74% | 3,997 | 7.4% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.35% | 1,922 | 14.4% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.72% | 1,928 | 12.7% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.19% | 1,569 | 17.9% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.73% | 4,949 | 8.4% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.46% | 7,756 | 7.0% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.75% | 828 | 18.5% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.09% | 1,487 | 11.5% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.68% | 2,265 | 13.3% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.21% | 4,414 | 8.0% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.00% | 1,120 | 8.8% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.25% | 2,815 | 7.0% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.69% | 29 | 8.3% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.11% | 1,511 | 3.3% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.79% | 4,099 | 3.5% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.45% | 98 | 1.6% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.90% | 364 | 2.3% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.41% | 3,199 | 6.8% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.22% | 2,048 | 13.8% |
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.30% | 989 | 3.4% |
[ 27.5% - 28.0% ] 27.66% | 141 | 4.1% |
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.79% | 2,393 | 11.1% |
[ 29.0% - 29.5% ] 29.46% | 112 | 16.7% |
[ 29.5% - 30.0% ] 29.71% | 1,454 | 14.7% |
[ 34.5% - 35.0% ] 34.82% | 784 | 6.3% |
[ 37.5% - 38.0% ] 37.80% | 746 | 34.3% |
[ 39.0% - 39.5% ] 39.33% | 178 | 36.1% |
[ 41.0% - 41.5% ] 41.45% | 152 | 2.3% |
[ 47.5% - 48.0% ] 47.59% | 145 | 23.1% |
[ 49.0% - 49.5% ] 49.12% | 57 | 2.2% |
[ 53.5% - 54.0% ] 53.85% | 104 | 25.0% |
[ 62.5% - 63.0% ] 62.79% | 43 | 33.3% |