Chickasaw vs Potawatomi Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Potawatomi
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Comparison
Chickasaw
Potawatomi
10.7%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
73.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
155th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
62.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
164th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Potawatomi Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,403,073 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.068 and weighted average of 10.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,657,518 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.443 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 1.2%.
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Potawatomi |
| Minimum | 2.1% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 26.4% | 55.0% |
| Range | 24.4% | 53.1% |
| Mean | 11.9% | 13.2% |
| Median | 11.5% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.1% | 7.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.2% | 15.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.1% | 8.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.4% | 8.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 8.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Potawatomi by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Ethiopian (10.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (10.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (10.7%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (10.7%, a difference of 0.22%), and Fijian (10.7%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Potawatomi are Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (10.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Malaysian (10.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Tsimshian (10.8%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Indonesia (10.8%, a difference of 0.22%), and Alaska Native (10.8%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 78.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 77.3 /100 | #150 | Good 10.6% |
| Spanish | 76.8 /100 | #151 | Good 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 76.5 /100 | #152 | Good 10.6% |
| Fijians | 75.6 /100 | #153 | Good 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 74.9 /100 | #154 | Good 10.7% |
| Chickasaw | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 10.7% |
| Ethiopians | 72.9 /100 | #156 | Good 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 72.9 /100 | #157 | Good 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 71.7 /100 | #158 | Good 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 70.8 /100 | #159 | Good 10.7% |
| Sudanese | 68.2 /100 | #160 | Good 10.7% |
| Arabs | 65.2 /100 | #161 | Good 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 64.8 /100 | #162 | Good 10.8% |
| Tsimshian | 64.5 /100 | #163 | Good 10.8% |
| Potawatomi | 62.6 /100 | #164 | Good 10.8% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 10.8% |
| Malaysians | 62.0 /100 | #166 | Good 10.8% |
| Alaska Natives | 60.3 /100 | #167 | Good 10.8% |
| Mongolians | 58.0 /100 | #168 | Average 10.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 56.8 /100 | #169 | Average 10.9% |