Chilean Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
COMPARE
Chilean
Select to Compare
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Chilean Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
11.2%
POVERTY | SENIORS > 65
27.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
194th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chilean Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,180,753 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.524 and weighted average of 11.2%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.89% in poverty level among seniors over the age of 65.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Chileans and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Chileans influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 within an area, or if Chileans simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Chileans by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Immigrants from Vietnam (11.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Taiwanese (11.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (11.1%, a difference of 0.24%), Bangladeshi (11.2%, a difference of 0.30%), and Albanian (11.2%, a difference of 0.39%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
| Immigrants from Middle Africa | 37.4 /100 | #187 | Fair 11.1% |
| Immigrants from Hong Kong | 36.3 /100 | #188 | Fair 11.1% |
| Immigrants from Laos | 35.7 /100 | #189 | Fair 11.1% |
| Indians (Asian) | 34.2 /100 | #190 | Fair 11.1% |
| Immigrants from Uganda | 32.2 /100 | #191 | Fair 11.1% |
| Immigrants from Southern Europe | 30.1 /100 | #192 | Fair 11.1% |
| Taiwanese | 29.2 /100 | #193 | Fair 11.2% |
| Chileans | 27.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 11.2% |
| Immigrants from Vietnam | 26.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 11.2% |
| Bangladeshis | 25.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 11.2% |
| Albanians | 24.4 /100 | #197 | Fair 11.2% |
| Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar | 21.3 /100 | #198 | Fair 11.3% |
| Immigrants from Israel | 20.3 /100 | #199 | Fair 11.3% |
| Alsatians | 20.1 /100 | #200 | Fair 11.3% |
| Immigrants from Brazil | 17.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 11.3% |
Chilean Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chilean Data | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Data |
| Minimum | 0.054% | 1.7% |
| Maximum | 21.3% | 44.7% |
| Range | 21.2% | 43.0% |
| Mean | 4.2% | 11.2% |
| Median | 3.1% | 10.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.6% | 8.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.2% | 12.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.6% | 3.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.9% | 6.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 6.6% |
Correlation Details
| Chilean Percentile | Sample Size | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.054% | 182,285,845 | 11.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.17% | 41,197,555 | 10.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.30% | 15,210,137 | 11.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.42% | 6,492,121 | 11.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.54% | 3,905,981 | 10.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.66% | 2,190,687 | 12.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.80% | 1,580,058 | 11.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.92% | 978,716 | 12.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.04% | 665,991 | 14.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.16% | 504,537 | 9.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.28% | 332,878 | 8.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.40% | 131,593 | 10.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.53% | 93,560 | 11.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.66% | 126,142 | 8.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.79% | 76,070 | 10.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.88% | 80,470 | 9.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.00% | 35,881 | 8.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.15% | 20,561 | 13.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.24% | 39,585 | 10.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.38% | 10,877 | 16.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.49% | 8,634 | 6.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.60% | 1,233 | 5.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.71% | 14,636 | 11.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.93% | 9,503 | 6.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.01% | 15,892 | 11.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.07% | 29,211 | 10.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.21% | 8,104 | 7.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.35% | 20,448 | 12.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.50% | 2,000 | 26.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.64% | 2,826 | 10.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.72% | 3,035 | 9.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.98% | 19,239 | 7.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.08% | 26,881 | 6.9% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.26% | 2,631 | 8.9% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.50% | 3,620 | 12.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.60% | 14,361 | 11.8% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.73% | 3,745 | 3.6% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.80% | 1,104 | 17.9% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.99% | 1,022 | 6.8% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.40% | 537 | 1.9% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.68% | 3,943 | 5.4% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.99% | 1,904 | 12.5% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.60% | 985 | 8.7% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.65% | 2,738 | 2.7% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.62% | 8,450 | 10.8% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.95% | 1,622 | 17.7% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.81% | 7,307 | 13.3% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.49% | 2,612 | 10.2% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.70% | 1,732 | 1.7% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.30% | 732 | 13.1% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.06% | 64 | 26.7% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.27% | 757 | 44.7% |