Chickasaw vs Laotian Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Laotian
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Comparison
Chickasaw
Laotians
10.7%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
73.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
155th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.6%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
79.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
145th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Laotian Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,403,073 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.068 and weighted average of 10.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,417,666 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.308 and weighted average of 10.6%, a difference of 0.81%.
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Laotian |
Minimum | 2.1% | 2.0% |
Maximum | 26.4% | 29.9% |
Range | 24.4% | 27.9% |
Mean | 11.9% | 11.6% |
Median | 11.5% | 10.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.1% | 8.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.2% | 14.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.1% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.4% | 6.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 6.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Laotians by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Ethiopian (10.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (10.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (10.7%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (10.7%, a difference of 0.22%), and Fijian (10.7%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Laotians are Alaskan Athabascan (10.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Iraqi (10.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Greece (10.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Asia (10.6%, a difference of 0.13%), and American (10.6%, a difference of 0.25%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
Immigrants | Kenya | 83.4 /100 | #140 | Excellent 10.5% |
Immigrants | Europe | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 10.5% |
Osage | 82.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 10.6% |
Immigrants | Asia | 80.8 /100 | #143 | Excellent 10.6% |
Iraqis | 80.7 /100 | #144 | Excellent 10.6% |
Laotians | 79.9 /100 | #145 | Good 10.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 10.6% |
Immigrants | Greece | 79.0 /100 | #147 | Good 10.6% |
Americans | 78.1 /100 | #148 | Good 10.6% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 78.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.6% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 77.3 /100 | #150 | Good 10.6% |
Spanish | 76.8 /100 | #151 | Good 10.6% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 76.5 /100 | #152 | Good 10.6% |
Fijians | 75.6 /100 | #153 | Good 10.7% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 74.9 /100 | #154 | Good 10.7% |
Chickasaw | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 10.7% |
Ethiopians | 72.9 /100 | #156 | Good 10.7% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 72.9 /100 | #157 | Good 10.7% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 71.7 /100 | #158 | Good 10.7% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 70.8 /100 | #159 | Good 10.7% |
Sudanese | 68.2 /100 | #160 | Good 10.7% |