Tlingit-Haida vs Choctaw Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Tlingit-Haida
Choctaw
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Tlingit-Haida
Choctaw
17.2%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
59.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
171st/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.4%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
310th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tlingit-Haida vs Choctaw Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,855,402 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.090 and weighted average of 17.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,665,834 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.196 and weighted average of 18.4%, a difference of 7.0%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Tlingit-Haida | Choctaw |
| Minimum | 5.0% | 9.7% |
| Maximum | 23.4% | 32.3% |
| Range | 18.4% | 22.6% |
| Mean | 14.7% | 19.6% |
| Median | 15.9% | 19.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.2% | 17.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.4% | 21.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 3.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.0% | 3.5% |
Similar Demographics by Cognitive Disability
Demographics Similar to Tlingit-Haida by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Tlingit-Haida are Ecuadorian (17.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Portugal (17.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Turkey (17.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants (17.2%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Syria (17.2%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| Armenians | 70.1 /100 | #164 | Good 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 64.9 /100 | #165 | Good 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 64.4 /100 | #166 | Good 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 63.5 /100 | #167 | Good 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 62.5 /100 | #168 | Good 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 61.8 /100 | #169 | Good 17.2% |
| Ecuadorians | 59.6 /100 | #170 | Average 17.2% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 59.4 /100 | #171 | Average 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 56.7 /100 | #172 | Average 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 50.2 /100 | #173 | Average 17.3% |
| Laotians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 17.3% |
| Tsimshian | 49.8 /100 | #175 | Average 17.3% |
| Shoshone | 49.2 /100 | #176 | Average 17.3% |
| Ute | 49.1 /100 | #177 | Average 17.3% |
| Spanish | 48.9 /100 | #178 | Average 17.3% |
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Hmong (18.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Chickasaw (18.5%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (18.4%, a difference of 0.37%), Immigrants from Western Africa (18.4%, a difference of 0.41%), and Yaqui (18.5%, a difference of 0.42%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Ugandans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Hmong | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 18.6% |