Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from Vietnam Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,235,045 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Vietnam within Immigrant from Latvia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.576. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latvia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.196% in Immigrants from Vietnam. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latvia corresponds to a decrease of 196.4 Immigrants from Vietnam.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,914 compared to $43,229, a difference of 17.8%), median male earnings ($61,422 compared to $54,913, a difference of 11.8%), and median earnings ($51,555 compared to $47,282, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($93,602 compared to $91,987, a difference of 1.8%), householder income over 65 years ($64,298 compared to $63,014, a difference of 2.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,454 compared to $106,417, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 17.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 14.5%), and single father poverty (15.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 0.080%), single female poverty (19.3% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 5.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.84%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 5.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 0.31%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 23.2%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 15.0%), and family households with children (25.9% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (29.1% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 0.55%), currently married (46.7% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.92%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 56.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 56.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 36.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 4.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.2% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 16.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 36.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 79.7%), professional degree (5.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 44.4%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 12.0%), hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 9.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.26%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.8%).