Chinese vs Subsaharan African Child Poverty Under the Age of 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,759,689 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.266 and weighted average of 11.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 502,334,948 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.650 and weighted average of 19.9%, a difference of 66.9%.

In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Hong Kong (12.1%, a difference of 1.8%), Iranian (12.2%, a difference of 2.6%), Thai (11.6%, a difference of 3.1%), Immigrants from Singapore (12.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and Immigrants from Iran (12.4%, a difference of 3.8%).

In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Bangladeshi (19.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Comanche (19.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Iroquois (19.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Belizean (19.9%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Cabo Verde (19.9%, a difference of 0.25%).