Chinese vs Subsaharan African In Labor Force | Age 16-19
COMPARE
Chinese
Subsaharan African
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Comparison
Chinese
Sub-Saharan Africans
38.6%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 16-19
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
107th/ 347
METRIC RANK
38.4%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 16-19
98.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
113th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Subsaharan African In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,804,450 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.268 and weighted average of 38.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 506,892,263 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.404 and weighted average of 38.4%, a difference of 0.43%.
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chinese | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 12.8% | 19.0% |
Maximum | 75.9% | 69.1% |
Range | 63.1% | 50.1% |
Mean | 40.5% | 40.9% |
Median | 39.4% | 39.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 35.7% | 37.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 42.8% | 44.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.1% | 6.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.5% | 7.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.4% | 7.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and Sub-Saharan Africans by In Labor Force | Age 16-19
In terms of in labor force | age 16-19, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Delaware (38.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Iraqi (38.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (38.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Lebanese (38.6%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Eritrea (38.7%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Hawaiian (38.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Scotland (38.5%, a difference of 0.13%), Crow (38.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Maltese (38.5%, a difference of 0.20%), and Bulgarian (38.3%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 16-19 |
Immigrants | Thailand | 99.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 38.7% |
Hmong | 99.1 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 38.7% |
Zimbabweans | 99.1 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 38.7% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.0 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 38.7% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 99.0 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 38.7% |
Iraqis | 98.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 38.6% |
Delaware | 98.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 38.6% |
Chinese | 98.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 38.6% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 98.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 38.6% |
Lebanese | 98.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 38.6% |
Maltese | 98.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 38.5% |
Crow | 98.5 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 38.5% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 98.5 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 38.5% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 98.3 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 38.4% |
Hawaiians | 98.2 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 38.4% |
Bulgarians | 97.9 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 38.3% |
Colville | 97.9 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 38.3% |
Chickasaw | 97.8 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 38.3% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 97.8 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 38.3% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 97.8 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 38.3% |
Ukrainians | 97.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 38.3% |