Chinese vs Subsaharan African Vision Disability
COMPARE
Chinese
Subsaharan African
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Chinese
Sub-Saharan Africans
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
97.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
85th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.3%
VISION DISABILITY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
248th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Subsaharan African Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,795,588 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.356 and weighted average of 2.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,474,731 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.288 and weighted average of 2.3%, a difference of 14.7%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese | Subsaharan African |
| Minimum | 0.40% | 0.34% |
| Maximum | 6.4% | 9.3% |
| Range | 6.0% | 9.0% |
| Mean | 2.3% | 2.6% |
| Median | 2.1% | 2.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.7% | 2.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.5% | 2.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.78% | 0.74% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.0% | 1.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.00% | 1.6% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Moldova (2.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Latvia (2.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Switzerland (2.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Norwegian (2.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Eastern Africa (2.0%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 98.3 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 98.1 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Lithuanians | 97.7 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Soviet Union | 97.6 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 97.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 97.5 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 97.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Chinese | 97.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 97.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 97.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Norwegians | 97.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 97.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 96.7 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 96.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 96.2 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Liberian (2.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Guatemalan (2.3%, a difference of 0.020%), French (2.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Bangladeshi (2.3%, a difference of 0.10%), and Alsatian (2.3%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Malaysians | 0.9 /100 | #241 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 0.8 /100 | #242 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.6 /100 | #243 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.6 /100 | #244 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Alsatians | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 2.3% |
| French | 0.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Guatemalans | 0.5 /100 | #247 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.5 /100 | #248 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Liberians | 0.5 /100 | #249 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.5 /100 | #250 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.4 /100 | #251 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Japanese | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Haitians | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 2.4% |