Chickasaw vs Fijian Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Fijian
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Comparison
Chickasaw
Fijians
11.6%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 75
90.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
105th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.8%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 75
83.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Fijian Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,762,079 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.231 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,762,719 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Fijians and poverty level among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.607 and weighted average of 11.8%, a difference of 1.2%.
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Fijian |
| Minimum | 1.7% | 1.2% |
| Maximum | 40.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 38.3% | 98.8% |
| Mean | 14.2% | 16.2% |
| Median | 12.2% | 11.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.6% | 8.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.1% | 13.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.5% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.7% | 21.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.7% | 20.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Fijians by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Singapore (11.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Russian (11.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Oceania (11.7%, a difference of 0.19%), Turkish (11.7%, a difference of 0.20%), and South African (11.7%, a difference of 0.20%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Fijians are Pakistani (11.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Italy (11.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Malaysian (11.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Nepal (11.8%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Uganda (11.8%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 90.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Chickasaw | 90.2 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Russians | 89.9 /100 | #106 | Excellent 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 89.4 /100 | #107 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Turks | 89.4 /100 | #108 | Excellent 11.7% |
| South Africans | 89.3 /100 | #109 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 88.7 /100 | #110 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Burmese | 88.7 /100 | #111 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 88.4 /100 | #112 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 87.0 /100 | #113 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Ukrainians | 86.9 /100 | #114 | Excellent 11.7% |
| New Zealanders | 86.3 /100 | #115 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Iraqis | 86.3 /100 | #116 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Icelanders | 85.7 /100 | #117 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 85.5 /100 | #118 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 84.8 /100 | #119 | Excellent 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 84.5 /100 | #120 | Excellent 11.8% |
| Malaysians | 84.1 /100 | #121 | Excellent 11.8% |
| Pakistanis | 84.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 84.0 /100 | #123 | Excellent 11.8% |
| Fijians | 83.8 /100 | #124 | Excellent 11.8% |