Canadian vs Immigrants from Northern Europe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 403,133,133 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Europe within Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.665. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.124% in Immigrants from Northern Europe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Canadians corresponds to an increase of 123.9 Immigrants from Northern Europe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,858 compared to $54,159, a difference of 18.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,625 compared to $111,676, a difference of 14.4%), and median family income ($106,597 compared to $121,840, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 1.1%), householder income under 25 years ($52,336 compared to $54,571, a difference of 4.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,230 compared to $69,003, a difference of 10.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 15.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 12.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.6% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.28%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 9.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 8.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.20%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.38%), and female unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.1% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 9.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.59%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.61%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 12.6%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 11.5%), and births to unmarried women (31.9% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.14 compared to 3.13, a difference of 0.33%), married-couple households (48.2% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 0.81%), and family households (64.4% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 28.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 9.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 32.9%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 29.2%), and master's degree (15.7% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.0%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.0%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 15.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 11.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 3.1%), disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 3.1%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 5.6%).