Canadian vs Immigrants from Western Europe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 409,846,057 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Europe within Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.601. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.108% in Immigrants from Western Europe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Canadians corresponds to an increase of 108.3 Immigrants from Western Europe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Western Europe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,858 compared to $50,065, a difference of 9.2%), median family income ($106,597 compared to $112,688, a difference of 5.7%), and median female earnings ($39,724 compared to $41,990, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,336 compared to $52,957, a difference of 1.2%), wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,560 compared to $108,824, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Western Europe communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 5.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 4.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (15.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.20%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.2% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 0.43%), and family poverty (8.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Western Europe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 8.7%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.070%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.53%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Western Europe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.1% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 6.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.35%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.050%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Western Europe communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 6.3%), births to unmarried women (31.9% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.14 compared to 3.14, a difference of 0.050%), currently married (48.3% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households (64.4% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Western Europe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 31.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 8.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 5.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Western Europe communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 22.3%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 22.3%), and master's degree (15.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.030%), high school diploma (90.6% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 0.040%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Western Europe communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 6.5%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 6.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.51%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.55%), and disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.93%).