Immigrants from Turkey No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Immigrants from Turkey
Select to Compare
No Vehicles in Household
Immigrants from Turkey No Vehicles in Household
11.5%
NO VEHICLES AVAILABLE
4.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
232nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Turkey No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,854,300 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Turkey and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.182 and weighted average of 11.5%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Turkey within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.27% in percentage of households with no vehicle available.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Turkey and percentage of households with no vehicle available does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Turkey influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of households with no vehicle available within an area, or if Immigrants from Turkey simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of households with no vehicle available due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Turkey by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Turkey are Houma (11.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Norway (11.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Japan (11.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Peru (11.5%, a difference of 0.23%), and Ugandan (11.4%, a difference of 0.32%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Immigrants from Sierra Leone | 6.4 /100 | #225 | Tragic 11.3% |
| Immigrants from Somalia | 5.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 11.4% |
| Immigrants from Pakistan | 5.4 /100 | #227 | Tragic 11.4% |
| Immigrants from Romania | 5.3 /100 | #228 | Tragic 11.4% |
| Ugandans | 5.3 /100 | #229 | Tragic 11.4% |
| Immigrants from Norway | 5.1 /100 | #230 | Tragic 11.4% |
| Immigrants from Japan | 5.1 /100 | #231 | Tragic 11.4% |
| Immigrants from Turkey | 4.8 /100 | #232 | Tragic 11.5% |
| Houma | 4.7 /100 | #233 | Tragic 11.5% |
| Immigrants from Peru | 4.5 /100 | #234 | Tragic 11.5% |
| Kiowa | 4.0 /100 | #235 | Tragic 11.5% |
| Cree | 3.5 /100 | #236 | Tragic 11.6% |
| Ute | 3.3 /100 | #237 | Tragic 11.6% |
| Russians | 3.2 /100 | #238 | Tragic 11.6% |
| Taiwanese | 2.8 /100 | #239 | Tragic 11.7% |
Immigrants from Turkey No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Turkey Data | No Vehicles in Household Data |
| Minimum | 0.075% | 2.2% |
| Maximum | 8.5% | 13.5% |
| Range | 8.4% | 11.3% |
| Mean | 3.2% | 8.6% |
| Median | 2.8% | 8.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.4% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.5% | 11.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.1% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.3% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.2% | 3.3% |
Correlation Details
| Immigrants from Turkey Percentile | Sample Size | No Vehicles in Household |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.075% | 205,697,888 | 11.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.42% | 12,831,008 | 12.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.77% | 2,349,057 | 11.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.06% | 860,297 | 10.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.37% | 295,747 | 7.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.66% | 333,313 | 12.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.98% | 291,176 | 6.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.31% | 62,964 | 11.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.63% | 42,587 | 12.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.85% | 31,954 | 8.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.16% | 6,954 | 4.6% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.53% | 10,650 | 2.2% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.78% | 17,240 | 4.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.24% | 2,384 | 7.6% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.51% | 2,440 | 3.1% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.28% | 1,648 | 6.1% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.78% | 11,458 | 8.2% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.32% | 5,476 | 9.2% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.47% | 59 | 13.5% |