Immigrants from Liberia vs Ottawa Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Liberia
Ottawa
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Liberia
Ottawa
15.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
265th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
255th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Liberia vs Ottawa Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 135,246,592 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Liberia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.579 and weighted average of 15.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,943,678 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Ottawa and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.056 and weighted average of 15.5%, a difference of 1.2%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Liberia | Ottawa |
| Minimum | 3.5% | 4.6% |
| Maximum | 45.5% | 31.7% |
| Range | 42.0% | 27.1% |
| Mean | 16.9% | 15.0% |
| Median | 14.0% | 15.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.7% | 10.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.6% | 18.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.9% | 8.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.4% | 6.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.3% | 6.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Liberia and Ottawa by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Liberia are Immigrants from El Salvador (15.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Ecuador (15.6%, a difference of 0.30%), Cherokee (15.6%, a difference of 0.42%), Mexican American Indian (15.6%, a difference of 0.43%), and Guyanese (15.6%, a difference of 0.44%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ottawa are Jamaican (15.5%, a difference of 0.30%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (15.4%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Jamaica (15.6%, a difference of 0.43%), Shoshone (15.6%, a difference of 0.49%), and Liberian (15.4%, a difference of 0.54%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Jamaicans | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Shoshone | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |