Chickasaw vs Apache Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
 Apache
 Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Apache
26.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
328th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Apache Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,052,400 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 26.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 229,845,911 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Apache and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.048 and weighted average of 27.7%, a difference of 5.5%.
 
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Apache | 
| Minimum | 11.1% | 16.4% | 
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% | 
| Range | 88.9% | 83.6% | 
| Mean | 35.8% | 48.6% | 
| Median | 30.6% | 40.7% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 24.5% | 32.1% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 42.2% | 64.0% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.7% | 31.9% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.0% | 23.3% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.8% | 23.0% | 
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Apache by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Black/African American (26.4%, a difference of 0.33%), Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 0.63%), Ottawa (26.0%, a difference of 1.0%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 1.9%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Apache are Menominee (27.8%, a difference of 0.46%), Dutch West Indian (27.5%, a difference of 0.91%), Creek (27.4%, a difference of 0.99%), Hopi (28.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and Native/Alaskan (28.2%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty | 
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313  | Tragic 25.6%  | 
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314  | Tragic 25.7%  | 
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315  | Tragic 25.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316  | Tragic 25.8%  | 
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317  | Tragic 26.0%  | 
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318  | Tragic 26.3%  | 
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319  | Tragic 26.4%  | 
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320  | Tragic 26.4%  | 
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321  | Tragic 26.6%  | 
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322  | Tragic 26.8%  | 
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323  | Tragic 26.8%  | 
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324  | Tragic 26.9%  | 
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325  | Tragic 27.2%  | 
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326  | Tragic 27.4%  | 
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327  | Tragic 27.5%  | 
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328  | Tragic 27.7%  | 
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329  | Tragic 27.8%  | 
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330  | Tragic 28.0%  | 
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331  | Tragic 28.2%  | 
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332  | Tragic 28.3%  | 
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333  | Tragic 28.4%  |