Chickasaw vs Apache Currently Married
COMPARE
Chickasaw
 Apache
 Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Chickasaw
Apache
46.6%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
47.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
178th/ 347
METRIC RANK
43.2%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
280th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Apache Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,723,431 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.194 and weighted average of 46.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 231,125,444 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Apache and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.488 and weighted average of 43.2%, a difference of 7.8%.
 
Currently Married Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Apache | 
| Minimum | 27.5% | 16.3% | 
| Maximum | 68.4% | 74.2% | 
| Range | 40.9% | 57.9% | 
| Mean | 48.9% | 40.0% | 
| Median | 49.7% | 39.7% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 45.0% | 30.0% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 54.2% | 46.7% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.2% | 16.7% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.5% | 12.3% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.4% | 12.2% | 
Similar Demographics by Currently Married
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Hawaiian (46.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Israeli (46.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Brazil (46.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Peruvian (46.6%, a difference of 0.080%), and Tlingit-Haida (46.7%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married | 
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 52.4 /100 | #171  | Average 46.7%  | 
| Aleuts | 52.0 /100 | #172  | Average 46.7%  | 
| Tlingit-Haida | 51.2 /100 | #173  | Average 46.7%  | 
| Peruvians | 50.0 /100 | #174  | Average 46.6%  | 
| Immigrants | Brazil | 49.9 /100 | #175  | Average 46.6%  | 
| Hawaiians | 48.6 /100 | #176  | Average 46.6%  | 
| Israelis | 48.6 /100 | #177  | Average 46.6%  | 
| Chickasaw | 47.8 /100 | #178  | Average 46.6%  | 
| Immigrants | Oceania | 44.6 /100 | #179  | Average 46.5%  | 
| Costa Ricans | 43.7 /100 | #180  | Average 46.5%  | 
| Ottawa | 43.0 /100 | #181  | Average 46.5%  | 
| Potawatomi | 41.9 /100 | #182  | Average 46.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 39.7 /100 | #183  | Fair 46.5%  | 
| Brazilians | 39.3 /100 | #184  | Fair 46.4%  | 
| Mongolians | 37.6 /100 | #185  | Fair 46.4%  | 
Demographics Similar to Apache by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Apache are Chippewa (43.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Central American Indian (43.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Ecuador (43.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Kiowa (43.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from El Salvador (43.1%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married | 
| Yaqui | 0.1 /100 | #273  | Tragic 43.4%  | 
| Nigerians | 0.1 /100 | #274  | Tragic 43.4%  | 
| Colville | 0.1 /100 | #275  | Tragic 43.4%  | 
| Sierra Leoneans | 0.1 /100 | #276  | Tragic 43.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 0.1 /100 | #277  | Tragic 43.4%  | 
| Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #278  | Tragic 43.3%  | 
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #279  | Tragic 43.3%  | 
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #280  | Tragic 43.2%  | 
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #281  | Tragic 43.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.0 /100 | #282  | Tragic 43.2%  | 
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #283  | Tragic 43.2%  | 
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.0 /100 | #284  | Tragic 43.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #285  | Tragic 43.0%  | 
| Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #286  | Tragic 42.9%  | 
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #287  | Tragic 42.9%  |