Chickasaw vs Yaqui Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Yaqui
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Yaqui
26.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
24.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
298th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Yaqui Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,052,400 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 26.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,224,239 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Yaqui and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.442 and weighted average of 24.9%, a difference of 5.6%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Yaqui |
| Minimum | 11.1% | 14.9% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 88.9% | 85.1% |
| Mean | 35.8% | 33.8% |
| Median | 30.6% | 29.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 24.5% | 21.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 42.2% | 37.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.7% | 15.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.0% | 17.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.8% | 17.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Yaqui by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Ottawa (26.0%, a difference of 1.0%), Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 1.9%), Iroquois (25.7%, a difference of 2.0%), Cherokee (25.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and Comanche (25.6%, a difference of 2.7%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yaqui are Mexican (25.0%, a difference of 0.67%), Blackfeet (25.1%, a difference of 0.74%), Honduran (25.1%, a difference of 0.92%), Shoshone (25.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and Somali (25.2%, a difference of 1.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 24.9% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 25.0% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 25.1% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 25.1% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 25.1% |
| Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 25.2% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |