Chickasaw vs Scotch-Irish Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Scotch-Irish
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Scotch-Irish
26.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
22.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
263rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Scotch-Irish Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,052,400 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 26.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 531,342,644 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Scotch-Irish and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.629 and weighted average of 22.9%, a difference of 14.5%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Scotch-Irish |
| Minimum | 11.1% | 8.1% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 88.9% | 91.9% |
| Mean | 35.8% | 41.2% |
| Median | 30.6% | 36.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 24.5% | 25.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 42.2% | 51.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.7% | 26.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.0% | 22.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.8% | 22.5% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Black/African American (26.4%, a difference of 0.33%), Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 0.63%), Ottawa (26.0%, a difference of 1.0%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 1.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
Demographics Similar to Scotch-Irish by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Scotch-Irish are Immigrants from Laos (22.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Central American (23.0%, a difference of 0.24%), British West Indian (22.8%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Micronesia (23.0%, a difference of 0.45%), and Senegalese (23.0%, a difference of 0.51%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.8 /100 | #256 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Sudanese | 0.7 /100 | #257 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.6 /100 | #258 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.6 /100 | #259 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Celtics | 0.5 /100 | #260 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.4 /100 | #261 | Tragic 22.8% |
| British West Indians | 0.4 /100 | #262 | Tragic 22.8% |
| Scotch-Irish | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.3 /100 | #264 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Central Americans | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Senegalese | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Fijians | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Hmong | 0.2 /100 | #269 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Inupiat | 0.2 /100 | #270 | Tragic 23.1% |