Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Armenia Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Armenia
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Armenia
26.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
37th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Armenia Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,052,400 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 26.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 97,216,113 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Armenia and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.103 and weighted average of 18.7%, a difference of 40.7%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Armenia |
| Minimum | 11.1% | 3.3% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 48.3% |
| Range | 88.9% | 45.0% |
| Mean | 35.8% | 18.8% |
| Median | 30.6% | 16.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 24.5% | 12.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 42.2% | 23.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.7% | 11.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.0% | 9.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.8% | 9.8% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Black/African American (26.4%, a difference of 0.33%), Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 0.63%), Ottawa (26.0%, a difference of 1.0%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 1.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Armenia by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Armenia are Turkish (18.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Japan (18.6%, a difference of 0.20%), Korean (18.6%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Philippines (18.6%, a difference of 0.44%), and Immigrants from Sri Lanka (18.6%, a difference of 0.50%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 18.5% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Turks | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 18.7% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 18.7% |
| Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Jordanians | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 18.9% |