Ute vs Apache Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Ute
 Apache
 Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Ute
Apache
28.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
333rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
328th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Apache Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,519,789 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.325 and weighted average of 28.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 229,845,911 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Apache and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.048 and weighted average of 27.7%, a difference of 2.5%.
 
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ute | Apache | 
| Minimum | 18.0% | 16.4% | 
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% | 
| Range | 82.0% | 83.6% | 
| Mean | 43.7% | 48.6% | 
| Median | 37.5% | 40.7% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 27.4% | 32.1% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 43.8% | 64.0% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.3% | 31.9% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.4% | 23.3% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.9% | 23.0% | 
Demographics Similar to Ute and Apache by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Yakama (28.3%, a difference of 0.42%), Native/Alaskan (28.2%, a difference of 0.68%), Pueblo (28.6%, a difference of 0.73%), Hopi (28.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Yemen (28.9%, a difference of 1.9%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Apache are Menominee (27.8%, a difference of 0.46%), Dutch West Indian (27.5%, a difference of 0.91%), Creek (27.4%, a difference of 0.99%), Hopi (28.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and Native/Alaskan (28.2%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty | 
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320  | Tragic 26.4%  | 
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321  | Tragic 26.6%  | 
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322  | Tragic 26.8%  | 
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323  | Tragic 26.8%  | 
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324  | Tragic 26.9%  | 
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325  | Tragic 27.2%  | 
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326  | Tragic 27.4%  | 
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327  | Tragic 27.5%  | 
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328  | Tragic 27.7%  | 
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329  | Tragic 27.8%  | 
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330  | Tragic 28.0%  | 
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331  | Tragic 28.2%  | 
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332  | Tragic 28.3%  | 
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333  | Tragic 28.4%  | 
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334  | Tragic 28.6%  | 
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #335  | Tragic 28.9%  | 
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #336  | Tragic 29.1%  | 
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337  | Tragic 29.4%  | 
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338  | Tragic 30.3%  | 
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #339  | Tragic 30.4%  | 
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #340  | Tragic 30.6%  |