Tohono O'odham vs Apache Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Tohono O'odham
Apache
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Tohono O'odham
Apache
34.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
347th/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
328th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tohono O'odham vs Apache Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,585,970 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.549 and weighted average of 34.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 229,845,911 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Apache and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.048 and weighted average of 27.7%, a difference of 23.4%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Tohono O'odham | Apache |
| Minimum | 23.3% | 16.4% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 76.7% | 83.6% |
| Mean | 57.1% | 48.6% |
| Median | 53.5% | 40.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 29.2% | 32.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 83.5% | 64.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 54.3% | 31.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 28.4% | 23.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 27.8% | 23.0% |
Demographics Similar to Tohono O'odham and Apache by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Tohono O'odham are Puerto Rican (34.1%, a difference of 0.30%), Houma (33.8%, a difference of 1.2%), Lumbee (33.0%, a difference of 3.6%), Crow (32.4%, a difference of 5.5%), and Navajo (31.7%, a difference of 8.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Apache are Menominee (27.8%, a difference of 0.46%), Dutch West Indian (27.5%, a difference of 0.91%), Hopi (28.0%, a difference of 1.2%), Native/Alaskan (28.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and Yakama (28.3%, a difference of 2.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 28.2% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 28.3% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 28.4% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 28.6% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 28.9% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 29.1% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 29.4% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 30.3% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 30.4% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 30.6% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 31.3% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 31.7% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 32.4% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 33.0% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 33.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 34.1% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 34.2% |