Chickasaw vs Somali Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Somali
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Somalis
26.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
25.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
303rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Somali Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,052,400 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 26.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 99,025,014 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Somalis and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.594 and weighted average of 25.2%, a difference of 4.1%.
![Chickasaw vs Somali Single Female Poverty](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/single-female-poverty/chickasaw-vs-somalis-single-female-poverty-chart.webp)
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Somali |
Minimum | 11.1% | 7.2% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 54.5% |
Range | 88.9% | 47.2% |
Mean | 35.8% | 26.3% |
Median | 30.6% | 23.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 24.5% | 19.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 42.2% | 30.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.7% | 10.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.0% | 9.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.8% | 9.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Somalis by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Black/African American (26.4%, a difference of 0.33%), Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 0.63%), Ottawa (26.0%, a difference of 1.0%), Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and Iroquois (25.7%, a difference of 2.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Somalis are Immigrants from Congo (25.3%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (25.3%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Mexico (25.3%, a difference of 0.38%), Shoshone (25.1%, a difference of 0.40%), and Honduran (25.1%, a difference of 0.48%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 25.1% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 25.1% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 25.1% |
Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 25.2% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 25.3% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 25.3% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 25.3% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 25.4% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 25.4% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 25.4% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 25.5% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |