Chickasaw vs Iranian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Iranian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Iranians
26.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
16th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Iranian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,052,400 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 26.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 312,309,917 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Iranians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.024 and weighted average of 18.0%, a difference of 46.1%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Iranian |
| Minimum | 11.1% | 3.3% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 41.3% |
| Range | 88.9% | 38.0% |
| Mean | 35.8% | 18.1% |
| Median | 30.6% | 16.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 24.5% | 13.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 42.2% | 21.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.7% | 7.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.0% | 7.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.8% | 7.0% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Black/African American (26.4%, a difference of 0.33%), Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 0.63%), Ottawa (26.0%, a difference of 1.0%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 1.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
Demographics Similar to Iranians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Iranians are Indian (Asian) (17.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Bolivian (17.9%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Korea (18.1%, a difference of 0.60%), Immigrants from Bolivia (17.8%, a difference of 0.75%), and Immigrants from Eastern Asia (18.1%, a difference of 0.88%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 18.0% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 18.3% |