Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Norway Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Norway
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Norway
26.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
63.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
167th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Norway Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,052,400 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 26.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 115,651,083 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.323 and weighted average of 20.8%, a difference of 26.1%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Norway |
Minimum | 11.1% | 9.8% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 65.2% |
Range | 88.9% | 55.4% |
Mean | 35.8% | 25.7% |
Median | 30.6% | 21.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 24.5% | 18.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 42.2% | 28.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.7% | 9.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.0% | 13.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.8% | 13.4% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Black/African American (26.4%, a difference of 0.33%), Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 0.63%), Ottawa (26.0%, a difference of 1.0%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 1.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Norway by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Norway are Norwegian (20.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Ugandan (20.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (20.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Iraqi (20.8%, a difference of 0.10%), and Lebanese (20.8%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 50.6 /100 | #173 | Average 21.0% |
Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |