Yakama vs Apache Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Yakama
Apache
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Yakama
Apache
28.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
332nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
328th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yakama vs Apache Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,831,112 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yakama and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.026 and weighted average of 28.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 229,845,911 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Apache and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.048 and weighted average of 27.7%, a difference of 2.1%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Yakama | Apache |
Minimum | 17.1% | 16.4% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 82.9% | 83.6% |
Mean | 42.1% | 48.6% |
Median | 38.2% | 40.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 25.8% | 32.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 52.2% | 64.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 26.4% | 31.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 22.2% | 23.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.7% | 23.0% |
Demographics Similar to Yakama and Apache by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yakama are Native/Alaskan (28.2%, a difference of 0.26%), Ute (28.4%, a difference of 0.42%), Hopi (28.0%, a difference of 0.90%), Pueblo (28.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and Menominee (27.8%, a difference of 1.6%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Apache are Menominee (27.8%, a difference of 0.46%), Dutch West Indian (27.5%, a difference of 0.91%), Creek (27.4%, a difference of 0.99%), Hopi (28.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and Native/Alaskan (28.2%, a difference of 1.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 28.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 28.3% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 28.4% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 28.6% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 28.9% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 29.1% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 29.4% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 30.3% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 30.4% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 30.6% |