Salvadoran vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Salvadoran
Chickasaw
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Salvadorans
Chickasaw
21.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
5.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
228th/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Salvadoran vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 394,529,574 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Salvadorans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.222 and weighted average of 21.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,052,400 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 26.3%, a difference of 19.7%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Salvadoran | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 1.6% | 11.1% |
| Maximum | 54.8% | 100.0% |
| Range | 53.2% | 88.9% |
| Mean | 21.2% | 35.8% |
| Median | 21.5% | 30.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.8% | 24.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.3% | 42.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 17.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.6% | 19.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.5% | 18.8% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Salvadorans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Salvadorans are Tlingit-Haida (21.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Western Africa (22.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Portugal (21.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Ghana (21.9%, a difference of 0.10%), and Welsh (22.0%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 8.0 /100 | #221 | Tragic 21.8% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 7.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 21.8% |
| Scottish | 7.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 21.8% |
| Barbadians | 7.2 /100 | #224 | Tragic 21.8% |
| English | 6.4 /100 | #225 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 5.8 /100 | #226 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 5.8 /100 | #227 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Salvadorans | 5.5 /100 | #228 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 5.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 5.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 22.0% |
| Welsh | 5.0 /100 | #231 | Tragic 22.0% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 5.0 /100 | #232 | Tragic 22.0% |
| Spaniards | 4.7 /100 | #233 | Tragic 22.0% |
| Spanish | 4.7 /100 | #234 | Tragic 22.0% |
| Dutch | 4.6 /100 | #235 | Tragic 22.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Black/African American (26.4%, a difference of 0.33%), Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 0.63%), Ottawa (26.0%, a difference of 1.0%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 1.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |