Immigrants from South Africa vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Africa
Chickasaw
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from South Africa
Chickasaw
20.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
93.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
125th/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South Africa vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 230,419,478 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.754 and weighted average of 20.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,052,400 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 26.3%, a difference of 30.6%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from South Africa | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 4.7% | 11.1% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 95.3% | 88.9% |
| Mean | 31.9% | 35.8% |
| Median | 23.5% | 30.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.1% | 24.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 35.4% | 42.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.3% | 17.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.9% | 19.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.4% | 18.8% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Africa by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Africa are Immigrants from Chile (20.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Brazilian (20.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Serbian (20.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Mongolian (20.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Spain (20.2%, a difference of 0.31%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 95.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 95.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| South Americans | 95.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 95.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | South America | 95.0 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Brazilians | 94.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 94.3 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 93.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Serbians | 93.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Mongolians | 93.2 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 92.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 92.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 92.3 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Pakistanis | 92.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Uruguayans | 92.1 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Black/African American (26.4%, a difference of 0.33%), Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 0.63%), Ottawa (26.0%, a difference of 1.0%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 1.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |