Immigrants from Central America vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Central America
Chickasaw
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Central America
Chickasaw
24.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
297th/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Central America vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 523,015,170 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Central America and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.771 and weighted average of 24.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,052,400 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 26.3%, a difference of 5.8%.

Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Central America | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 11.1% | 11.1% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 88.9% | 88.9% |
Mean | 35.5% | 35.8% |
Median | 28.8% | 30.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 23.6% | 24.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 35.4% | 42.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.8% | 17.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.4% | 19.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 20.3% | 18.8% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Central America by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Central America are Yaqui (24.9%, a difference of 0.19%), African (24.8%, a difference of 0.28%), Hispanic or Latino (24.6%, a difference of 0.76%), Mexican (25.0%, a difference of 0.86%), and Blackfeet (25.1%, a difference of 0.94%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 24.3% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 24.4% |
Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 24.5% |
Americans | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 24.5% |
French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 24.6% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 24.6% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 24.8% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 24.8% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 24.9% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 25.0% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 25.1% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 25.1% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 25.1% |
Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 25.2% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 25.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Black/African American (26.4%, a difference of 0.33%), Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 0.63%), Ottawa (26.0%, a difference of 1.0%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 1.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |