Ghanaian vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Ghanaian
Chickasaw
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Ghanaians
Chickasaw
21.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
15.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
207th/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ghanaian vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 189,278,551 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.211 and weighted average of 21.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,052,400 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 26.3%, a difference of 21.8%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ghanaian | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 2.1% | 11.1% |
Maximum | 52.6% | 100.0% |
Range | 50.5% | 88.9% |
Mean | 22.2% | 35.8% |
Median | 20.7% | 30.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.5% | 24.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.7% | 42.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 17.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.4% | 19.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.3% | 18.8% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Ghanaians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ghanaians are Belgian (21.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Haitian (21.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Finnish (21.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (21.6%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Africa (21.5%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Irish | 21.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 21.4% |
Nigerians | 20.9 /100 | #201 | Fair 21.4% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 20.7 /100 | #202 | Fair 21.4% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 18.8 /100 | #203 | Poor 21.5% |
Immigrants | Africa | 16.7 /100 | #204 | Poor 21.5% |
Finns | 16.2 /100 | #205 | Poor 21.5% |
Belgians | 16.1 /100 | #206 | Poor 21.5% |
Ghanaians | 15.7 /100 | #207 | Poor 21.6% |
Haitians | 15.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 21.6% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 15.1 /100 | #209 | Poor 21.6% |
Immigrants | Panama | 14.4 /100 | #210 | Poor 21.6% |
Icelanders | 14.0 /100 | #211 | Poor 21.6% |
Jamaicans | 14.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 21.6% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 13.7 /100 | #213 | Poor 21.6% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 13.3 /100 | #214 | Poor 21.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Black/African American (26.4%, a difference of 0.33%), Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 0.63%), Ottawa (26.0%, a difference of 1.0%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 1.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |