Immigrants from Venezuela vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Venezuela
Chickasaw
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Venezuela
Chickasaw
20.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
91.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
134th/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Venezuela vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,137,962 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Venezuela and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.204 and weighted average of 20.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,052,400 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 26.3%, a difference of 29.8%.

Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Venezuela | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 2.3% | 11.1% |
Maximum | 33.4% | 100.0% |
Range | 31.0% | 88.9% |
Mean | 18.0% | 35.8% |
Median | 19.0% | 30.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.3% | 24.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.8% | 42.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 17.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.4% | 19.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 18.8% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Venezuela by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Venezuela are Immigrants from Iraq (20.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Canada (20.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from England (20.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Pakistani (20.2%, a difference of 0.12%), and Uruguayan (20.2%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Mongolians | 93.2 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Spain | 92.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 92.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 92.3 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Pakistanis | 92.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Uruguayans | 92.1 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | England | 91.9 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 91.5 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 91.2 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Canada | 91.2 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 90.6 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Slovenes | 90.5 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 90.4 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Syrians | 90.4 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Immigrants | North America | 89.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 20.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Black/African American (26.4%, a difference of 0.33%), Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 0.63%), Ottawa (26.0%, a difference of 1.0%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 1.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |