Immigrants from Uruguay vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uruguay
Chickasaw
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Uruguay
Chickasaw
20.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
77.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
152nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Uruguay vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,556,340 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.503 and weighted average of 20.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,052,400 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 26.3%, a difference of 27.5%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Uruguay | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 10.4% | 11.1% |
| Maximum | 60.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 49.6% | 88.9% |
| Mean | 29.9% | 35.8% |
| Median | 21.6% | 30.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.7% | 24.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 47.7% | 42.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 29.0% | 17.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.8% | 19.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.3% | 18.8% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uruguay by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uruguay are Swedish (20.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Western Europe (20.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Samoan (20.6%, a difference of 0.15%), South American Indian (20.6%, a difference of 0.18%), and Puget Sound Salish (20.6%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Austrians | 85.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Venezuelans | 85.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 20.4% |
| South Africans | 85.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
| Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
| Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
| South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
| Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Black/African American (26.4%, a difference of 0.33%), Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 0.63%), Ottawa (26.0%, a difference of 1.0%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 1.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |