Asian vs Burmese Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Asian
Burmese
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Asians
Burmese
18.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
23rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
22nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Asian vs Burmese Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 534,134,882 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Asians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.620 and weighted average of 18.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,450,200 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.055 and weighted average of 18.3%, a difference of 0.0%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Asian | Burmese |
Minimum | 3.9% | 1.8% |
Maximum | 30.6% | 43.2% |
Range | 26.7% | 41.3% |
Mean | 15.6% | 16.0% |
Median | 16.0% | 15.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.7% | 11.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.1% | 19.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 7.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.4% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 6.5% |
Demographics Similar to Asians and Burmese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Asians are Maltese (18.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Greece (18.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Armenian (18.3%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Singapore (18.3%, a difference of 0.33%), and Immigrants from Israel (18.3%, a difference of 0.35%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Maltese (18.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Greece (18.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Armenian (18.3%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Singapore (18.3%, a difference of 0.33%), and Immigrants from Israel (18.3%, a difference of 0.35%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 18.0% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Armenians | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 18.4% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 18.5% |
Immigrants | Poland | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 18.5% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 18.5% |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 18.6% |