Immigrants from Guatemala vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Guatemala
Chickasaw
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Guatemala
Chickasaw
24.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
285th/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 373,364,568 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.356 and weighted average of 24.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,052,400 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 26.3%, a difference of 8.9%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Guatemala | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 3.0% | 11.1% |
Maximum | 90.5% | 100.0% |
Range | 87.4% | 88.9% |
Mean | 32.5% | 35.8% |
Median | 27.7% | 30.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 23.6% | 24.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 35.1% | 42.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.5% | 17.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.0% | 19.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.9% | 18.8% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Guatemala by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Guatemala are Cree (24.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Bangladeshi (24.2%, a difference of 0.19%), Spanish American (24.2%, a difference of 0.21%), U.S. Virgin Islander (24.2%, a difference of 0.26%), and Indonesian (24.3%, a difference of 0.60%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 23.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 23.6% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 23.7% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 23.8% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 23.8% |
German Russians | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 23.9% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 23.9% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 24.1% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 24.1% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 24.2% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 24.2% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 24.2% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 24.3% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 24.4% |
Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 24.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Black/African American (26.4%, a difference of 0.33%), Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 0.63%), Ottawa (26.0%, a difference of 1.0%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 1.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |