Immigrants from Jamaica vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Jamaica
Chickasaw
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Jamaica
Chickasaw
21.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
30.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
192nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Jamaica vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 298,568,365 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jamaica and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.077 and weighted average of 21.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,052,400 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 26.3%, a difference of 23.4%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Jamaica | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 4.4% | 11.1% |
Maximum | 59.3% | 100.0% |
Range | 54.9% | 88.9% |
Mean | 20.4% | 35.8% |
Median | 20.8% | 30.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.6% | 24.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.1% | 42.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 17.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.3% | 19.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.2% | 18.8% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Jamaica by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jamaica are Immigrants from Germany (21.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Basque (21.3%, a difference of 0.18%), Czechoslovakian (21.3%, a difference of 0.21%), Nicaraguan (21.3%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (21.3%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 38.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 21.2% |
Hawaiians | 37.7 /100 | #186 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 36.8 /100 | #187 | Fair 21.2% |
Yugoslavians | 35.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 35.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 21.2% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 35.2 /100 | #190 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Germany | 31.1 /100 | #191 | Fair 21.3% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 30.5 /100 | #192 | Fair 21.3% |
Basques | 28.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 21.3% |
Czechoslovakians | 27.7 /100 | #194 | Fair 21.3% |
Nicaraguans | 27.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 21.3% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 27.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 21.3% |
Japanese | 26.4 /100 | #197 | Fair 21.3% |
Swiss | 24.2 /100 | #198 | Fair 21.4% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 22.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 21.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Black/African American (26.4%, a difference of 0.33%), Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 0.63%), Ottawa (26.0%, a difference of 1.0%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 1.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |