Immigrants from Latvia vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Latvia
Chickasaw
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Latvia
Chickasaw
19.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
72nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Latvia vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,952,917 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.118 and weighted average of 19.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,052,400 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 26.3%, a difference of 35.9%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Latvia | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 5.7% | 11.1% |
Maximum | 55.9% | 100.0% |
Range | 50.1% | 88.9% |
Mean | 19.7% | 35.8% |
Median | 17.6% | 30.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.3% | 24.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.9% | 42.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 17.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.2% | 19.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.0% | 18.8% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Latvia by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latvia are Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (19.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Jordan (19.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Peru (19.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Belarus (19.3%, a difference of 0.11%), and Paraguayan (19.3%, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Cypriots | 99.6 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Palestinians | 99.6 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 99.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Laotians | 99.5 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Paraguayans | 99.5 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 99.4 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 99.4 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | Peru | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 99.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Peruvians | 99.4 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Russia | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Albanians | 99.3 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 99.3 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Black/African American (26.4%, a difference of 0.33%), Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 0.63%), Ottawa (26.0%, a difference of 1.0%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 1.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |