Guatemalan vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Guatemalan
Chickasaw
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Guatemalans
Chickasaw
23.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
282nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Guatemalan vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 404,542,149 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.447 and weighted average of 23.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,052,400 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 26.3%, a difference of 10.1%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Guatemalan | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 12.4% | 11.1% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 87.6% | 88.9% |
Mean | 33.7% | 35.8% |
Median | 28.4% | 30.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 23.4% | 24.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 37.5% | 42.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.1% | 17.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.8% | 19.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.7% | 18.8% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Guatemalans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Guatemalans are Immigrants from Zaire (23.8%, a difference of 0.050%), German Russian (23.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Dominica (23.9%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Latin America (23.7%, a difference of 0.56%), and Alaskan Athabascan (23.6%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 23.4% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 23.5% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 23.6% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 23.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 23.6% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 23.7% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 23.8% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 23.8% |
German Russians | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 23.9% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 23.9% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 24.1% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 24.1% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 24.2% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 24.2% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 24.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Black/African American (26.4%, a difference of 0.33%), Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 0.63%), Ottawa (26.0%, a difference of 1.0%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 1.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |