Ethiopian vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Ethiopian
Chickasaw
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Ethiopians
Chickasaw
19.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
96.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
106th/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ethiopian vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,686,273 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.101 and weighted average of 19.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,052,400 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 26.3%, a difference of 32.0%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ethiopian | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 4.8% | 11.1% |
Maximum | 33.2% | 100.0% |
Range | 28.4% | 88.9% |
Mean | 18.6% | 35.8% |
Median | 18.8% | 30.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.6% | 24.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.9% | 42.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.3% | 17.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 19.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 18.8% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Ethiopians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Immigrants from Syria (19.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Native Hawaiian (19.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Colombian (19.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Western Asia (19.9%, a difference of 0.080%), and Israeli (19.9%, a difference of 0.090%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Sierra Leoneans | 97.9 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 19.7% |
Ukrainians | 97.6 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 19.8% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 97.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 19.8% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 97.3 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 19.8% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 97.1 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Chileans | 96.9 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Israelis | 96.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Ethiopians | 96.7 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Immigrants | Syria | 96.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Native Hawaiians | 96.6 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Colombians | 96.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 96.5 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 96.1 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 96.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 95.9 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Black/African American (26.4%, a difference of 0.33%), Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 0.63%), Ottawa (26.0%, a difference of 1.0%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 1.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |