Haitian vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Haitian
Chickasaw
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Haitians
Chickasaw
21.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
15.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
208th/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Haitian vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 284,824,358 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Haitians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.367 and weighted average of 21.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,052,400 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 26.3%, a difference of 21.8%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Haitian | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 7.9% | 11.1% |
| Maximum | 41.8% | 100.0% |
| Range | 33.9% | 88.9% |
| Mean | 21.5% | 35.8% |
| Median | 21.3% | 30.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.6% | 24.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.8% | 42.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 17.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.6% | 19.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 18.8% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Haitians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Haitians are Immigrants from Eastern Africa (21.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Ghanaian (21.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Belgian (21.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Finnish (21.5%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Panama (21.6%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Nigerians | 20.9 /100 | #201 | Fair 21.4% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 20.7 /100 | #202 | Fair 21.4% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 18.8 /100 | #203 | Poor 21.5% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 16.7 /100 | #204 | Poor 21.5% |
| Finns | 16.2 /100 | #205 | Poor 21.5% |
| Belgians | 16.1 /100 | #206 | Poor 21.5% |
| Ghanaians | 15.7 /100 | #207 | Poor 21.6% |
| Haitians | 15.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 21.6% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 15.1 /100 | #209 | Poor 21.6% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 14.4 /100 | #210 | Poor 21.6% |
| Icelanders | 14.0 /100 | #211 | Poor 21.6% |
| Jamaicans | 14.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 21.6% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 13.7 /100 | #213 | Poor 21.6% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 13.3 /100 | #214 | Poor 21.6% |
| Ecuadorians | 12.3 /100 | #215 | Poor 21.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Black/African American (26.4%, a difference of 0.33%), Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 0.63%), Ottawa (26.0%, a difference of 1.0%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 1.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |